In an attempt to create the kind of double feature the WHC film series specializes in, I borrowed this week from the WHC Film Studies Center two films released in 1972: Luis Buñuel's The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie and Ingmar Bergman's Cries and Whispers. The match-up was better than I expected. I had seen both films before, some time ago for Bergman, more recently for Buñuel, but even so, I wasn't quite thinking about the degree to which both films, in rather different ways, are scathing indictments of the bourgeoisie.
It's hard, watching the films, to detest the bourgeois characters at once. Unless one already approaches art from the perspective of the class warrior, ready in a heartbeat to tear down these protected and self-satisfied lives lived with dedicated servants attending them, splendid accouterments surrounding them, and a sense of decorum and mastery in all their actions -- and in Bergman's film, beautifully photographed by Sven Nykvist.
au table their taste and sense of manners come to the fore -- and our coterie of six or seven diners is interrupted time and again. At times, one or several of the principles engages in scenes separate from the group -- particularly memorable is one member of the group, M. Thevenot, interrupting an assignation between his wife and Don Rafael Acosta (Fernando Rey, the unflappable, slightly sinister face associated with late Buñuel); Acosta is then visited by an attractive young female terrorist sent to kill him. He offers her champagne, naturellement. Indeed, Acosta's attitude toward terrorists and agitating students is benignly ruthless -- a tone set throughout the film. Then there's the three women attempting to have tea at a restaurant that's out of tea, and coffee, and doesn't serve liquor, but does feature a soulful lieutenant at a nearby table who asks permission to tell the strange story of his mother's ghost and her wish that he murder the man he had believed to be his father...
Buñuel's film is full of odd moments of feeling that clash -- we might say jarringly, we might say surreally -- with the world of the bourgeoisie but which they seem to accept, unruffled, forbearing, displaying their characteristic charme discret. Oddities abound -- such as a bishop who volunteers to work as gardener for one couple, then is called to the bedside of a dying workman who, it turns out, was the murderer of the bishop's parents long ago. But quizzical as such moments are, I got my biggest laugh from a local peasant woman who confides to the bishop: "I can't accept Jesus. Even as a little girl I hated him."
In Buñuel's world, soldiers see ghosts and have interesting dreams, peasants have unexpected complexity; in Bergman's film, the selfless servant, Anna, is the only locus of real feeling and devotion. The sisters, Karin (Ingrid Thulin) and Maria (Liv Ullmann) are unhappily married to men who may be partly to blame for their states of soul, but the film seems to assume that bourgeois marriage can't be fulfilling for anyone. Karin is a real hater and her self-loathing at one point had taken the form of inserting broken glass into her vagina and then smearing the blood across her lips while lying back in bed and seeming to beckon to her husband (much older than her, more of a father figure). Meanwhile, also in the past, Maria's fling with the local doctor (Erland Josephson) caused her husband to inflict a negligible wound upon himself. Lives of quiet desperation, in other words. This all sounds the stuff of lurid melodrama, but add to it the fact that, in the present, the eldest sister, Agnes (Harriet Anderson) is dying painfully of cancer at home on the estate (where the other two sisters are visiting to care for her) and you've got the stuff of Bergmanian psychodrama, as familiar to his world as the absurdity and interlineated stories are to Buñuel's.
froideur of these lives.
Or maybe that's just to say that the peasant who could never stand Jesus had more immediate resonance for me than the Christlike (or actually Madonna-like) servant Anna. Though I won't say Bergman's characteristic religious questioning didn't resonate for me, surprisingly moreso than usual (I must be getting old) in the prayer of the priest over Agnes' dead body. Delivered by Anders Ek, the indelible Frost in Bergman's Sawdust and Tinsel (1953), the prayer spoke precisely for a bourgeoisie without firm convictions, whose lives are structured to avoid acknowledgment of real suffering or need or desire, asking one who has suffered to represent their case before God, asking, as it were, for forgiveness for their superficiality and lack of purpose.
Full of seething, wormy, hollow feelingsrather nasty --How beastly the bourgeois is!
--D. H. Lawrence, "How Beastly the Bourgeois Is --" (1929)